After reading the information about the six students, record each student's number - then whether you would nominate them for testing or not. If you would, what do you notice that indicates giftedness? If you would not recommend them, what stands out to you?
Needed to be sure your menu was received and recorded? This link has the list! :) http://www.giftedconsultant.com/fortbend.htm
ReplyDeleteStudents 1 and 2 do not seem to have GT specific aptitudes regarding Hispanics, unless student #2 is considered GT in terms of art. However, Hispanics tend to have a particular sense of art and colour due related to our folklore, culture and traditions in general. Not enough academic information is provided, neither age so to speak, to really identify them more accurately. Conversely, student #3 could be an exceptional Hispanic (in terms of being loud and argumentative), but that would be very "unhispanic" (again, not enough academic info is given).
ReplyDeleteIt would be amazing to consider student #3 a GT, since the child seems to avoid speaking English, which is contradictory, according to a couple of articles concerning Hispanic GT's I have read (ERIC EC by Jaime Castellano). Student # 4 would lean more towards a high achiever rather than a GT, particularly due to the "waiting for others to do the work". Student #5 could be GT according to Castellano, since the student would fall into the "street wise" category. Once again, not enough academic info is given for an accurate identification (actually, the info of all 6 students concerns their behviour). Out of the 6, student # 6 could be the one that sparks definitely more aptitudes within the high achiever/GT line, given that persistent and leadership attributes are more evident.
ReplyDeleteStudents #1, #2, and #3 should be tested, in my opinion. #1 appears to be a dominant conformer as evidenced by his/her obvious ability in his/her native language. #2 appears to be a dominant non-conformer as he/she still wears traditional clothing and is highly artistic. #3 also appears to be a dominant non-conformer and has strong language abilities.
ReplyDeleteOf students #4, #5, #6, I believe that only #5 should be tested. #4 seems to be struggling in general and #6 appears to be an over-achiever. I like that #5 is evidently highly motivated to learn and practice English even if some of the language he/she wants to learn is inappropriate in most social situations.
Of course, ideally, these children would be students in EEISD and all of them would be tested since "everyone is gifted in their own way."
I feel student #1 and #2 should be tested. Student #1 has a great interest in reading and is reading above their level. When he is asked to work in a group, he does more than expected of him. Student #2 has a great interest in art. He is a loner and he is always working on something constructive. This student needs to stay busy. Student #3 I would not recommend.
ReplyDeleteStudent #4 and #5, I will not recommend. Student #4 puts up no effort. Student #5 seems that he is just a clown and want attention from his peers. Student #6 would be recommended. He is demonstrating a willing to go that extra mile to learn. That show effort.
I would not recommend student #4 because he/she does not put much effort in his/her work. It seems that he/she is not self motivated to learn and the teacher would constently has to redirect. Student #5 seems to be in need of much attention. He seems to be very curious and wants a choice. He would definitely benefit from MENUS. He has his own way of processing information. I would recommend this student. Student #6 is definitely a high achiever. I would reccomend him as well due to all the effort and perseverance to learn and succeed in school.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIt was hard to decide from the information given about students 4, 5 and 6. I was close to just saying these three should not be nominated but now feel that student 5 should be nominated. I picked student 5 because he/she seems like a dominant non-conformer. The student seems rebellious since they like to argue and in group, things have to be done their way. This student also said that the parents didn't attend on parent visit day because the student didn't want them to. It could be that the student is trying to hide the fact that they maybe did not want to attend or the real reason? It seems interesting that this student is interested in learning English ( esp the bad words). Student 4 seems like an average student and student 6 seems like a high achiever.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIt was hard for me decide because all the scenarios did not share enough academic information. Based on what I read, I would not recommend students #4 (Underachiever). I would recommend #5 because of leadership ability and persuasive ability. This student had initiative to convince the parents not to attend parent visit day. Also apparently with all the days missed, this student has retained some learning if student can add adequate information to be in command of discussion in the group. I would not recommend Student #6. This student appears to be a high achiever without any gifted tendencies.
ReplyDeleteStudents #4 and #5 seem as though they are dealing with behavior issues. I am interested in Student #6 because this student is interested in his studies. Making flash cards and offering to answer all the questions during class and he really seems to be an overacheiver. I am concerned about student #5 because he has no parental involvement and he has very low self-esteem.
ReplyDeleteI agree that there was not a lot of academic information shared on any of the students, but based on the information given,I would not recommend students 4 or 5. Student #4 answers with lots of new vocabulary, but uses it incorrectly. This student does not go above and beyond during questioning. #5 would not be recommended because this student seems to be an attention seeker and the parents do not seem to be involved. I would, however nominate #6 because this student is persistent, does well in all areas and seems to have good work ethics.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Cynthia. I would not nominate Student #4 and #5 because they have put forth little effort and have required too much attention in class. The desire and motivation to learn was not shown. I would nominate Student #6 because the student appears to be a high achiever with leadership capabilities and is persistent with his/her studies.
ReplyDeleteI would refer students 4 and 5, but not 6. #4 is a vocabulary risk-taker, always trying to use the newest vocabulary, albeit incorrectly for a period of time. This is a trait I particularly admire since I had an extended silent period. Student #5 is a dominant conformer, trying to be the center of attention, getting the group to do its task their way, and learning new words (especially the bad ones). Besides that, this student's strong suit is the spoken word, and leadership. This one avoids the weaker areas, such as writing. Student #6 seems to be a high achiever, rather than a gifted student.
ReplyDeleteIt was difficult to make a decision with so little information. I would not recommend student #4, because from the experience I have had in my classroom, GT students don’t accept corrections well. They want to do it their way. I would not recommend student #5 either. When they are interested in something, they want to take charge of everything. I would recommend student #6. Although, he does not show enough GT characteristic; this student shows signs of a high achiever (is very persistent, and takes teacher’s advice seriously) and I think will benefit with the challenges the GT program will offer. With hesitation I would recommend student #1, for his reading abilities and for the willingness to do more. I would recommend student #2. Sounds like this student, has great artistic abilities, “he is always in school; he is always working on something constructive.” I would recommend him to give him the opportunity to be challenged with higher level concepts. I would not recommend student #3. In our culture, students tend not to be argumentative with the teacher. I would recommend some of these students if I “HAD” to have something turned in.
ReplyDelete#4 would not recommend. I do appreciate the striving to incorporate new words, but I think that the gifted would not continue to make the same type of error consistently.
ReplyDelete#5 possibly recommend but need more info on academics. Appears to have strong survival and leadership skills although the child needs to be a more constructive leader. Shows a lot of intelligence in surviving and learning English.
#6 would not recommend. Appears to be a high achiever.
I don't feel that their is enough academic information to fairly choose. #6 wouldn't be recommend. This child appears to be a high achiever. #5 would not recommend. Learning English is important, but from what little is known it seems that this child needs attention that he/she might not be getting at home. #4 would not recommend. We don't know how long this child has been where their is alot of English being spoken. Could be using words that are hear on TV. I need more information.
ReplyDeleteStudent #4 - Would not reccommend for GT because their is no evidence of high level interest or abilities.
ReplyDeleteStudent #5 - Would not reccommend for GT with current information. There are some characteristics of a gifted learner but not any of the high interest or high level ability.
Student #6 - No GT referral at this time. Student is sensitive, persisitent and a high achiever as some gifted students are. Student is social and does not display area of particular high ability.
From students #4,5, and #6 I would only recommend student #5 to be tested. Even though student #4 seems to be willing to learn new vocabulary, no matter that includes bad words it doesn´t mention too much of his academic performance. Student #5 seems like a rebellious students who is a leadership, the fact that he persuades his parents to go to parents conference shows he is pretty smart. I am not sure if academically too but it would be interesting to test this kid. Student #6 seems to be only a high achiever.
ReplyDeleteStudent #4 needs more motivation; perhaps with the right motivation he might show some traits of GT
ReplyDeleteStudent #5, Shows leadership and persuasive abilities. He seems to looking for people’s attention, probably with the right adaptations and motivation he might show real giftedness. It will be better to have more academic information about this student before referring him to the GT program.
Student #6, Shows to be more a high achiever than a Gt.
Student #4: This student puts forth effort, but he or she is hesitant to answer aloud. This student needs more motivation and doesn't show indicators that would suggest they be tested.
ReplyDeleteStudent #5: This student may have issues with attitude yet wants to learn new things and new words. But there is no indicator of an academic effort or motivation.
Student #6: This student may be reffered for testing. He or she is motivated and involved in the class. He or she also shows a quality of being helpful in the class.
Student 4-Will not recommend for testing- Student seems to want to try out new words but is relatively unsuccessful when applying them, shows no examples of going above and beyond. During parent visit, he waits for the adults to interact.
ReplyDeleteStudent 5-Will recommend for testing- He tries to be the center of attention and is argumentative, wants to get out of doing “undesirable” work (writing for the group). He may have issues at home that affect his attendance.
Student 6-Will not recommend for testing- The student that usually follows teacher suggestions to do more work to understand a concept, who willingly attempts each situation and assignment without discussion or pressure could be considered a high achiever or compliant child, not a gifted student. During parent visit, he waits for the adults to interact.
#4, at first glance, does not exhibit giftedness. The use of new vocabulary words, even if used incorrectly, could point to giftedness in areas other than verbal/linguistic. #5 displays dominant non-conformer behaviors and might be gifted in leadership capacities, given the right instruction. #6 may be a high achiever rather than gifted because of their work and study habits. More information is required...
ReplyDeleteOut of students 4, 5, & 6, I feel that student #5 should be tested for GT services. It appears that student #5 may not know what to do his or her giftedness; so therefore they may act out and want attention because their gift is often misunderstood. Student #6 is definitely a high achiever but shows no true gifted and talented qualities. Student #4 does not take the initiative to do things on their own. They often wait for others to complete a task.
ReplyDeleteI would not recommend 4, 5, or 6 for gt testing. 4 seems be a child trying to excel in class and apply the knowledge he learns. 5 is an underachiever, and 6 is a high achiever.
ReplyDelete#4 I would not recommend this student because he/she does not use new vocabulary correctly and does not go above and beyond. He/she is really lacking the motivation and self confidence most GT kids have. Although it could be due to the language barrier. #5 I would recommend because they have a natural drive for learning and do not like to be told what to do and question authority. #6 I would not recommend. There was nothing that really stood out except that the child was doing what was required. I would consider this student to be a high achiever.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Kendra. Although I feel like more information is needed to determine their unofficial GT status, I think that they can all be recommended for GT.
ReplyDeleteStudent 4 may just be a high achiever, but they challenge themselves to look into new vocabulary to apply to their daily learning.
Student 5 may not be an underacheiver because they lack the discipline developed from constantly being in school. Their behavior is affect by their frequent absences, but it sometimes shows that they can be a leader by delegating responsibility because they dont want to be responsible for the activity themselves.
Student 6 may very well just be a hgh achiever, but their will to push forward and take intitiave may qualify them for GT based on their work ethic and desired to succeed.
I believe students 1, 2, 3 and 5 should be tested.
ReplyDeleteStudent one seems to be a bit of a dominant conformer. S(he)pays attention in class and is quiet, pleasant and cooperative. The student excels in reading particularly in their own language and seems to be reading very quickly and above their level. The student works in the group and volunteers when there is a specific goal in mind.
Student 2 appears to be gifted artistically and seems to be a conformist. S(he) pays attention and hardly ever speaks. The student also wears traditional attire although the students somtimes pick on this.
Student 3 appears to be gifte dlinguistically and highly communicative. They have picked up many other languages from the other students. They also appear to be a dependent conformer becuase they pout when reprimanded and seem to be a bit manipulative adn sensitive.
Student 5 seems to be a dominant non-conformer. They also are very talented linguistically and are excited to learn new words. The student appears to be in rebellion against the parents and does not want them involved at school. They are willing to work with the group, but want things done their way.
This was a bit tricky for me. There is not nearly as much information on their academics as I would need to make a truly informed decision. I would not recommend student 4 because they seem to be held back by something; maybe they are not motivated, or not interested, or confused. It says they do give an answer when called on, but this students doesn't demonstrate mastery or higher level thinking abilities/desires. Also strives to use new vocabulary, but this seems somewhat random in choice.
ReplyDeleteStudent 5 confuses me. I actually want to consider nominating, but am not sure. Frequent absences and home problems could be a great influence on behavior, and this could be interfering with appropriate contributions. Am leaning towards considering because this student actually has initiative to take charge and has a one-mind track, which I find in many of my GT kids, and could be defensive with writing and argumentative simply because of language barriers and embarassment.
Student 6 could be a possible recommendation. However, just because exhibits many of the great attributes of a good student, doesn't necessarily mean they are gifted. They almost sound more like a high achiever, however, without knowing more about actual academic performance, I would go ahead and recommend this student for initial testing.
I think students #1 and #2 should be tested. I think reading above grade level is an indication of G& T, and the same regarding student #2 who has artistic traits which display creativity, common in some GT students.
ReplyDeleteAs for students 5 and 6 there is not enough information to decide, however behavioral issues of student #5 are a red flag for me, and I would not recommend a student that needs so much attention, for a GT program.
And for student #6 the information indicates to me that he is in the side of high achievers rather than on the side of GT students. And student #4 is an under achiever than needs to be pushed, therefore I would not recommend a student like that to be tested for GT.
I would say student 4 is an underachiever but I would recommend for GT testing. I would alsp recommend student 5 for GT testing even though they are a troublemaker, but they do them to be preficint in some areas of acadim study. Iwoul have to say student 6 is a high achiever not GT.
ReplyDeleteStudent 4: I would not recommend this student for GT. There is not any evidences that lead me in the direction of GT.
ReplyDeleteStudent 5: This Student is a Dominate Non-conformer,(Rebel) I would recommend this student for GT because in class we have learned about Rebels. They have low morals, no concern for social problems, extremely low achiever. This student must see that they have qualities of giftedness.
Student 6: Studious High-Achiever. This student is self-motivated and wants to please their teacher and parents. This student is concerned with how the task is to be done, not why. For this student is considered logical, organized and punctual. I would recommend this student for GT.
#5 seems to be an extrovert who has his/her own mind. The interest in new vocabulary and wanting to do things their way might be a sign of giftedness. I would probably nominate him/her. I don't think #4 is gifted. I think #6 is a high achiever, not necessarily gifted.
ReplyDeleteI would recommend student 5 due to them not following the rules. And that they are self motivated and does not seem to be related to parent involvement. I think student 4 and 6 both have involved parents and could be high acheivers, but not necessarily gifted based on the information given.
ReplyDeleteStudents 4 and 6 should not be recommended. They are both hard workers and 6 makes the high achiever category. Number 4 will probably get to high-achiever status with some time.
ReplyDeleteStudent 5, I would subject student 5 to testing. We aren't given much information on the actual capabilities and testing would hopefully demonstrate that this child wants to prove his/her genius by being hostile. Perhaps that is whhy they dont work hard either and demand attention. Other needs aren't being met perhaps.
I would not recommend student #4 and #5
ReplyDeleteStudent #4 has underachiever qualities by doing only enough to get by. Their modest behavior is inconsistency with what they know by showing off vocabulary but not taking time to learn how to use it in the right context.
Student #5 has social and leadership issues which is evident in the way they treat their peers in the group. Learning and practicing English appeared to be common to me since I had the opportunity to sub for a bilingual second grade class in which the students where excited to hear stories in English. A student would be ready with another book as soon as I finished reading one. So the interest in English did not stand out as a sign of giftedness along with the avoidance of doing work.
I would recommend student #6. They would be the high achiever versus a true gifted student. This student is focused and self motivated on doing well with their studies even if they have to work extra hard to get the grades. This is the only student to have both parents attend the parent visit day, so they have a combined support base at home as well as confidence to reach out to their peers to be successful.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI would have nominated student #5. They have leadership -and manipulative- abilities. They definetly stand out among their peers, it can be a sign of giftedness...maybe accompained by lack of a structure and proper guidance acoording to their needs. Student # 6 sounded to me like a high achiever, who could or could not be a gifted child.
ReplyDelete#4- I would not recommend because he is not taking time to learn the vocabulary words correctly.
ReplyDelete#5- This student shows signs of leadership and knows the material just might not want to work. I would reccomend for testing.
#6- This student seems more like a high achiever and not GT. They do their work like they are supposed to but their are no signs that they go above and beyond or would want to.
Student 4: I thought this student was not GT due to the repetition of the same mistakes after correction.
ReplyDeleteStudent 5: I would recommend this student for GT testing due to leadership qualities and independence of thought described in the notes.
Student 6: I might nominate this student for testing, but I thought s/he was more of a high achiever because of the classroom participation, making and practicing with flash cards, and compliance with assignments.
Student 4
ReplyDeleteI am not sure if I would or would not nominate this student for testing. This student does just enough to get by, but he includes lots of new vocabulary although incorrectly used.
Student 5
I may nominate this student because he displays some of the common characteristics of a troublemaker that may be overlooked for GT. He is argumentative and is unwilling to compromise when working with a group.
Student 6
I would nominate this student because he displays characteristic of being a high achiever. This student is persistent with his studies and follows all the instructions to the final detail.
Based on the information provided, I would recommend student #1 because he is showing above average skills in reading, which is a good indication of Giftedness. He does things for rewards, however I think most kids do the same, and most kids are very competitive.
ReplyDeleteI would definitely recommend student # 3, since he has a natural ability to learn foreign languages by being exposed only a few months to them in the classroom. Being a foreign language teacher that amazes me!
I would also recommend student #2 because he displays creative and artistic traits that some GT students have. In fact I have some students in my class that have similar characteristics, and they have been identified as GT.