After reading the information about the six students, record each student's number - then whether you would nominate them for testing or not. If you would,what do you notice that indicates giftedness? If you would not recommend them, what stands out to you? Post your comments for students #1,#2, and #3 here.
Wanted to be sure your menu was received and recorded? This link has the list - will be updated as menus are submitted! :) http://www.giftedconsultant.com/fortbend.htm
ReplyDeleteStudents 1,2,&3 Nominated, but will have to really work with them. Have the ability to do great work and to learn. Also, parents take an interested in there children. That shows the children that there parents are will to help them learn as much as they can. That really makes a differents in a child life. 4, 5, & 6 Not to be nominated, because it is as if the children not really interesting in learn, because they a absent a lot not showing a big interested in what they needs to learn to help them through school of life. That has a lot to do with the parents, because the parents a re not showing a big interested in there child life. It is very important to be involved in your child life when they are in schooland out of school. They will become a better person in life.
ReplyDeleteI would say that students 1, 2, and 3 show traits of giftedness and should be nominated. For student 1, it's the fact that they seem to have trouble paying attention, yet they are always wanting to read a book; a different book every day and reading above level. Student 2 seems like a loner who is very quiet, but is always working on something constructive. He/she enjoys drawing and is picked on by others (dependent non conformer). Student 3 seems to be a handful and the fact that they are always writing (even in the native language of some of the other students) was interesting. When reprimanded, this student actually makes it a point to bring up others who may have gotten away with similar infractions.
ReplyDeleteIt was hard for me decide because all the scenarios did not share enough academic information. Based on what I read, I would not recommend Students #1 (Underachievers). Although Student #2 appears to be an underachiever, I would be apprehensive not to recommend this student because of the student’s artistic abilities. I would recommend #3 because this student not only strives to understand in his/her native language but is capable of understanding the written languages of some of the other students. In addition, this student demonstrates cognitive ability by just distinguishing the consequences of the same behaviors of the other students not being equal to the same consequences of his/her behaviors.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Diane I felt like I didn't have enough information on the students. I do not think any of the students are gifted to me because I really didn't have more detail about them. It seems as if they are average students dealing with shyness or social skills and learning to deal with other students who are outgoing. However, I did find student #2 to be gifted with an artistic ability. Student #1 seemed tob e comfortable talking and working with others. Student #3 seems to be really active and notices what all the other kids are doing all the time.
ReplyDeleteI would nominate students 1, 2, and 3 because each one appears to have some traits of giftedness, but as Valeria said they would really need a lot of help and encouragement. All of their parents or at least 1 parent is involved in their education. #1 reads above level in their language, #2 seems to love drawing, which may be their area of giftedness nd #3 would rather talk than practice english, but writes in their language and other languages as well.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Larry. I would nominate students one and two. Student #1 daily reads a different book that is above grade level. Student #2 is artistic and is always working on something constructive. Student #3 appears to be a rebel (one type of a gifted student). Additionally, he can speak and write in several languages which is awesome. Since the teacher has to frequently remind him to practice and stop talking, his behavior may eventually affect him academically. However, I would need additional, academic information on this student, before nominating him.
ReplyDeleteI would definitely nominate students 2 and 3: #2 because of the demonstrated artistic ability, and #3 because of the ability with languages. #3 is demonstrating traits of a possible dominant nonconformer and is sensitive to the injustice of being picked out for the same behavior as others who are apparently not reprimanded. I had more difficulty in deciding whether to refer student #1 or not. I finally decided to refer the student because of the possibly advanced reading ability. This student may be showing traits of a dominant conformer. And my philosophy now is, when in doubt, refer for testing...
ReplyDeleteSince these are all elementary students, any sign of potential giftedness should be tested. #1 shows signs with language acquisition and reading level. #2 has artistic ability reflecting possible giftedness as well as dependent non-conformer traits. The "suffering artist"? #3 displays gifted traits in language acquisition and dependent conformer characteristics. #4, at first glance, does not exhibit giftedness. The use of new vocabulary words, even if used incorrectly, could point to giftedness in areas other than verbal/linguistic. #5 displays dominant non-conformer behaviors and might be gifted in leadership capacities, given the right instruction. #6 may be a high achiever rather than gifted because of their work and study habits. More information is required...
ReplyDeleteStudent #1 not only reads everyday, he/she reads a different book everyday above his/her reading level. However, they will participate in class activities, taking on a leadership role. I would consider nominating this student. I would also consider students #2,#3 and #5. #2 has his/her own mind (clothing) is constructive, and is artistic. They seem to be introverted which may mean they are in very deep, higher level thinking. #3 appears to have a very high level of language learning. They seem to be a little high strung and seems very observant. #5 seems to be an extrovert who has his/her own mind. The interest in new vocabulary and wanting to do things their way might be a sign of giftedness. I don't think #4 is gifted. I think #6 is a high achiever, not necessarily gifted.
ReplyDelete#1 would recommend due to love of reading and reading ability.
ReplyDelete#2 seems to be artistically gifted and would recommend. I would like to see what child can produce academically with a menu assignment.
#3 would recommend because of ability to pick up languages.
Student #1 - Possible GT referral due to reading above level and intensity of reading interest. Also could be perfectionist due to volunteering to speak for the group. Student is not social but has ability to contribute in a group setting.
ReplyDeleteStudent #2 - Possible GT referral for artistic skill and intensity of interet in it. Student is not social either due to gifted nature or could be cultural.
Student #3 - GT referral most probable due to high language aquisition skills noted as student speaks and writes multiple languages. High energy level noted. Also notice that student perceives injustices when they are reprimanded and others have gotten away with same infractions.
#1 would be recommend. This student is very interested in reading and reads above level in their language. #2 would not recommend. Says he is an artistic and can draw. But what are they comparing it to. What are the guide lines for artistic. Is it the same as mine. I would have to know more. #3 would be recommend because of language ability.
ReplyDeleteEven though there is not much academic information I would recommend students #1,2 to be tested. The interest of student #1 to read books above level caught my attention, student #2 seems very artistic and as we discussed in one of our classes, not all students are only GT in academic. In the other hand student #3 has some traits of GT because of his language skills and his ability to be out spoken.
ReplyDeleteStudents 1, 2 and 3 show some gifted characteristics but I would prefer to have more academic background before recommending them. Student #1 seams to be ager to learn new things by reading a book everyday, probably this has help him to read above his grade level.
ReplyDeleteStudent #2, seams to be an artistic GT.
Student #3 showed language ability, likes to speak and write, but again this is not enough information.
Student #1:I would possibly recommend this student for testing. The fact that he or she reads above level could be a good sign. Not paying attention may be a sign of boredom also.
ReplyDeleteStudent #2: This student could be recommended for testing because he or she knows the classroom, is on task, and pays attention. However, there are no clues to indicate how they are above the other students except for artistic abilities.
Student #3: This student is an extrovert who needs attention. There is not enough information to determine whether this child should be tested or not.
Definitely more information is required, but at first glance….
ReplyDeleteStudent 1-Will not recommend for testing- Even though the child is a good reader, I see no other indicators that he may be gifted. He seems compliant when asked to participate in group work. During parent visit, he waits for the adults to interact.
Student 2-Will recommend for testing- I notice the intensity and persistence in self set tasks (very artistic). The child may be considered a bit of a misfit (still wears clothing that do not help him fit in). During parent visit, he interacts with the adults.
Student 3-Will recommend for testing- The child has a high energy level, demonstrates remarkable language skills, shows extreme expressions (pouts when reprimanded), perceives injustices and moral wrongs (points out at other students who have committed similar infractions). During parent visit, he interacts with the adults.
I would nominate all three students as each student exhibits "signs" or gives indications of gifted behavior. Student 1 may be reserved due to introverted tendencies, not necessarily waiting for a parent to lead. Student 2's lack of social awareness may also be an indicator along of course with the artist capabilities. Student 3 shows high emotional intelligence.
ReplyDeleteIt is possible that both #2 and #3 could be recommended for GT services. Both students show signs of giftedness either through artistic ability or language acquisition.
ReplyDelete- Student 1: I would not recommend this student. They are an avid reader, but they do not display any giftedness. He does actively participate in group activity, but it seems that he does it for the candy.
ReplyDelete- Student 2: I would recommend this student for gt testing because the child does display giftedness in some areas and the child has a very introverted personality which is probably due the fact that the child is constantly picked on by its peers. And the child prefers adults over peers.
- Student 3: I would recommend this student for gt testing because they are able to perceive injustices (even if it is because the child is off-task most of the time). Also, the child was very boisterous when it came for their parent to come because the child was trying to explain everything the class has done for the year.
#1 Although this student is very interested in reading and reads above level in their language, I would not recommend them for testing. I don't think anyone is checking for understanding on those above level books and it seems, he/she works for a reward. This seems like someone who just loves to read. #2 I would recommend because his/her artistic ability seems it may be due to a higher level of thinking. #3 I would have to recommend this student solely on the information provided. I would need to know a little more to make a better judgement. I'm thinking with the immature behavior (pouting) it could be due to GT, rebelling and being independent minded, and writing in the native languages of others.
ReplyDeleteThe decision was hard to make because of there weren't enough details given on each student in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteI would probably recommend Student #3 because of their language adaptation. Their behavior are signs of a bored GT student who is acting out for attention and to entertain themselves.
#2 comes in a strong second for a referral because of their artist abilities. This may be their way of communicating what they are learning.
#1 is questionable because oh the question, why don't they read like that in English. I understand that this doesn't mean that they can't be GT because they may be comfortable in their own language. The qualities that would make them a candidate is the constant need to read to occupy their time. This is also a sign of boredom.
It was hard for me to make a desicion since there were not many academic details, but I would recommend all three students because they all show signs of giftedness. Student #1 seems to learn through reading books. I ask myself if maybe there is a language barrier and has difficulty understanding the teacher therefore prefers to read. Student #2 Seems to be an artistic GT student based on the few details it also says he always pays attention. Student #3 seems to love attention. Maybe he acts out because is bored and seems to do things his own way and that is a good GT sign.
ReplyDeleteStudent 1 would recommend. Loves to read (and excels)--doesn't matter if its in native language or English, has the capabilities and is much more enjoyable in advanced native language. Will put book down if interested, may be reading all the time out of sheer boredom. May not pay attention due to language barrier. Would recommend!
ReplyDeleteStudent 2 seems to be shy/picked on due to cultural differences. Would recommend due to artistic outlet of thought processes and high constructive ability.
Student 3 seems to be very social, may act out because of language barriers and embarassment. Is very socially active maybe due to boredom and craving for a quicker pace. All this leads me to think they may really excel in a debate/choice assignment, and would be a recommendation for gifted, could just need the variety and choice to channel the focus in the right direction.
Student 1 would be recommended for GT testing. They seem to be and advent reader in above level reading. They want to complete task for rewards so them are motivated by a challenge.
ReplyDeleteStudent 2 I would recommend for GT testing in art. They seem to be a creative intellectual.
Student 3 would be recommended for GT testing because they seem to have strong communication ability and even in other languages. This student also seems to spend their school days with others of similar abilities and a social leader.
Student 1: this student appears to be a social leader. I would refer this student for GT. This student appears to be popular with the teacher and the students in the class. They want to channel their energy. Therefore, when asked to participate the student was will to work and speak for the group. This student demonstrates leadership qualities
ReplyDeleteStudent 2: ( a creative Intellectual) This student appears to be gifted creatively. This student is self-motivated and uses his time constructively. I would refer this student for GT.
Student 3: This student is not being challenged in class. This child wants attention. They do not know how to channel their energy. This student even studies different languages. I would recommend this student for GT. If this student can learn a different language this is a student that is highly intelligent.
From the short and limited descriptions of each student, I think I will recommend student nos. 2, 3 and 6 for GT testing.
ReplyDeleteStudent no. 2 is very confident in herself by still wearing their traditional clothing. This child knows how to entertain her parents on parent visit day and always work on something constructive and is artistic as well.
Student No.3 shows a lot of energy and is aware of all the things happening around her.She is very vocal and exhibits a talent in arguing. She has a talent to be a social leader.
I think student no. 6 belongs to the studious high achievers group. She follows rules and is very persistent with her studies.
I would nominate students 1 and 2. Student 1 for the appearance of wanting very much not to be bothered, thus the reason for the book. Student 2 for their artistic ability. I would not nominate student 3 due to the high social needs of this child. But then on the other side, with their higher vocabulary this could be another reason to, but the reason why I primarily wouldn't is due to their high activity levels.
ReplyDeleteStudent 1
ReplyDeleteI would not nominate this student for testing because there was nothing about this person that set him apart from the average peer. This child seems to be most comfortable in his native language and environment. He will also only do what his has to in order to get a reward he desires.
Student 2
I would nominate this student for testing because he is very artistic, structured, and listens even when not watching. This child always sits alone and enjoys working on something creative.
Student 3
I would nominate this student for testing because he uses his knowledge of other languages to a better advantage. He is also noted as being and energetic and active child. He is also very excited to show his parents around.
Student 4
I am not sure if I would or would not nominate this student for testing. This student does just enough to get by, but he includes lots of new vocabulary although incorrectly used.
Student 5
I may nominate this student because he displays some of the common characteristics of a troublemaker that may be overlooked for GT. He is argumentative and is unwilling to compromise when working with a group.
Student 6
I would nominate this student because he displays characteristic of being a high achiever. This student is persistent with his studies and follows all the instructions to the final detail.
#1 Reads well. I would encourage him/her to read in english. Of course I would recommend student #1 to GT for their exceptional reading ability if I were a grade school teacher.
ReplyDelete#2 Obviously picks up on many things and wants to explain them. Though he/she may not communicate regularly or openly he/she understands a great deal and demonstrates it in his/her natural language.
#3 The ability to pick up languages demonstrates this child's brightness. I would argue that in itself is giftedness.
I would not recommend student #1 for GT testing. Student #1 has some signs of dependent issues with their parent. I feel that they are only participating for an intrinsic reward. They are always reading which is a sign of giftedness, but in their native language only.
ReplyDeleteStudent #2 and #3 have some signs of giftedness that would have me to recommend them for testing.
Student #2 would be a child that is overlooked based on the fact that they are shy and may conform to the class expectations. If they had a choice of activities they would choose something creative that may require an illustration to demonstrate knowledge of learning.
Student #3 reminds me of students from past classes that give GT a reputation of being very social. I would recommend based on the fact that they can write in their language as well as their peers language.
To me, all three students seemed show a certain number of GT signs, so it was hard to think in terms of choosing one against the others.I guess I would have rank them, top to bottom 2, 3 and 1. Student #1 seemed intrinsically interested in learning, not necessarily in what occurs in the classroom setting. Student #2 seemed quiet and introverted, but it drew my attention that he spent time explaining the classroom to his parents, this tells there's meaning in it to him. Besides, his self motivation and specially his artistic abilities are -in my opinion-definite signs to consider.Student #3 seemed to me as disruptive as any student with disruptive tendencies (we have them every year and they are not escarse) Except...was he speaking (and writing!) in several other languages?...Did he pick them up just by being exposed in the classroom or did he studied/traveled to different countries? If so, how long did it take for this child to learn them? That student also seemed to me worth testing.
ReplyDelete#1- The student loves to read and excels in their native language. I would refer for GT testing.
ReplyDelete#2- This student is quiet and does not like attention to be drawn to him. He shows his parents important features of the classroom which shows a genuine interest in learning. I would refer this child as well.
#3- I would wonder if this student was being disruptive because he is not challenged or did not understand the work. Once I could figure that out, I would determine whether he needed testing.
Obviously this was posted after class, so I already know the actual outcomes, but I will include my initial assessment and any thoughts I had after learning whether or not the student was actually nominated.
ReplyDeleteStudent 1: I believed this student to be a high acheiver rather than a GT student because of the level of diligence shown to classwork and the comfort of reading in his/her native language. I was surprised to learn that responding to classroom reward systems and cooperating in groups were characteristics of a Hispanic GT student.
Student 2: I beleived this student to be gifted in the area of arts because of his/her constant involvement in constructive activities like art, but I did not recognize the wearing of traditional clothing or the cartaking attitude toward parents as GT traits.
Student 3: I would nominate this student for their facility with languages and overdeveloped sense of justice.
Based on the information provided, I would recommend student #1 because he is showing above average skills in reading, which is a good indication of Giftedness. He does things for rewards, however I think most kids do the same, and most kids are very competitive.
ReplyDeleteI would definitely recommend student # 3, since he has a natural ability to learn foreign languages by being exposed only a few months to them in the classroom. Being a foreign language teacher that amazes me!
I would also recommend student #2 because he displays creative and artistic traits that some GT students have. In fact I have some students in my class that have similar characteristics, and they have been identified as GT.